RE 440 plus

David M. Porritt dporritt@post.cis.smu.edu
Wed Sep 15 10:19 MDT 1999


Ken:

What is your policy (stated or unstated) there at Oberlin regarding pitch?
Are there times when you won't/can't change it?  How much will you vary it?

dave

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 9/15/99 at 11:56 AM Kenneth Sloane wrote:

>To All- I don't think the requests to tune above 440 are necessarily
>associated with the search for a brighter sound. Most of the music
directors
>that insist on 440 plus tunings have absolute pitch, and they probably
grew
>up listening to and playing in orchestras that perform at a pitch level
>above 440. By conditioning, they carry around a "higher" A in their ears
>that they "force" on other people.
>
>To give my arguement some historical perspective, The American Fedration
of
>Musicians back in 1921 -- to combat all the musical groups and musical
>instrument manufactures that were using an A that had risen, in many
cases,
>above 450 -- adopted 440 as their standard; but it was already too late.
Too
>many prominent musicians already had the A440 plus imprint in their brain,
>and there was no going back.
>
>Sorry, but the 440 battle is a losing one.     Ken Sloane, Oberlin
>Conservatory


_____________________________
David M. Porritt
dporritt@swbell.net
Meadows School of the Arts
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX 75275
_____________________________



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC