At 02:14 PM 8/28/2002 -0500, you wrote: >On 8/28/02 12:58 PM, "Wimblees@aol.com" <Wimblees@aol.com> wrote: > > > With all due respect to Kent, I wholeheartedly disagree with floating > pitch. > >Here David has finally tried a technique that results in measurably better, >more stable tunings, and you, just in your 2nd year as a CAUT, try to >introduce doubts. Shame on you, Wim. Pitch floating makes sense; hold out as >long as you like, but you're going to like it when you finally try it! :) > >Congratulations, David. Hang in there. > >Kent Swafford I'd stress myself more than the school budget if I tried to maintain 440. No one complains if the pianos are sharp but everyone does if they're flat. They're about +20c now and will drop to pitch or -10c by the next tuning allowed during the Christmas vacation. Ambition is a good thing but it has a way of catching up to you. Jon Page
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC