So then, what is the best method for establishing the salary of an institutional piano technician? I know right now of a private sector utility company hiring unskilled apprentice workers with high school education at $16/hour with the full compliment of benefits. Their workday will be weekdays 8 - 4:30, and when they're there any time other than that, they'll get 1.5x overtime, with a 3 hour minimum. After two years as apprentice, their base pay will increase to $42K, and can earn up to 5 weeks paid vacation according to years of service. It is not uncommon for this position to pay in excess of $50K with minimal overtime investment. They'll have pension, as well as profit-sharing, with company matched investment in stock plans. (Our state currently isn't even matching 401K contributions). My salary is very close to the average of those in the CAUT survey, and is at $18.58/hour. Therefore, the average CAUT pay is comparable to that of unskilled workers with no experience in the private sector. That's my argument. Why shouldn't we earn salaries which are more comparable to SKILLED, EXPERIENCED professionals in the private sector? Sure, self-employed techs don't get the group benefit plans and paid holidays and vacation, but that's the case with any self-employed scenario. They also have the potential to earn a lot more money in an 8 hour day than we do. Over the past year, I've seen ads in the Journal placed by private sector dealerships looking for technicians which advertise salaries, the lowest of which was barely below the average CAUT salary and was for an "apprentice level" technician, and up to $75K for a capable store tech. One even provided transportation. And yes, they all advertised paid vacation, health insurance, 401K, etc. I see ads for truck drivers, "will train", which offer salaries comparable to our average. Ask what the mail carrier, or the UPS driver (threatening a strike again) makes. How do our skills compare to those? Is there no value for our highly specialized skill? Sure, we enjoy our work, and the work climate and benefits are good (but really not a lot different from what's available from employers in the private sector). But groceries cost money. Are we working as volunteers so that we can enjoy what we do? Or are we working to put groceries on the table and a roof over our heads? Paid leave is a very nice benefit, but unless we spend it working, it puts no additional money in our pockets, and besides, most every company in the private sector offers that for their skilled professionals, too. If we as a group truly consider ourselves to be highly skilled craftsmen, requiring the highest skill levels in the craft, then why are we content with what everybody else considers entry level salaries? Jeff Mike Jorgensen wrote: > Hi Willem, > Thanks for the comment, the more I think about it the more I agree >with you on all you have said. >-Mike
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC