ETD's

David's Email ilvey@sbcglobal.net
Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:23:30 -0800


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Dave,

I've been considering getting the Verituner but after lifting David =
Love's machine, have decided my SAT III is just fine.  If weight isn't a =
consideration then "probably" the Verituner will give you a better =
tuning.  Side by side comparisons I haven't done but doubt there is =
enough difference to overcome the weight issue, for me!  =
Unisons/Octaves/Stability RULE!   I charge my SAT III about once a =
month.  I try to schedule it for every 2 weeks.  The SAT III is smaller =
than your SAT I, which you will like.  It doesn't have the bells and =
whistles of the Cybertuner or Verituner, but, for me, simple is the =
best. =20

David I.




caut@ptg.org=20
  Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 8:58 AM
  Subject: ETD's


  Caut,

  I'm considering buying a new tuner, and I'm looking for advice. I'm =
looking at the SAT, Cybertuner, and Verituner. What are your experiences =
with these, which do you prefer, and why. I've used an SAT I for 12 =
years, and I'm wondering if the newer devices do give a better tuning.

  =20

  Dave Forman

  Westminster Choir College of Rider University

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/aa/1c/84/98/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC