Octagonal Shanks

Wolfley, Eric (wolfleel) WOLFLEEL@UCMAIL.UC.EDU
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:38:52 -0500


Jim,

After extensive empirical research I have determined that the shanks Renner
and others sell are indeed octagonal, so your research has now been
duplicated. A square with the corners cut off. I think hex rolls off the
tongue better than oct and sounds more sexy or something. Its hard to stop
being wrong sometimes.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Ellis [mailto:claviers@nxs.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:43 PM
To: caut@ptg.org
Subject: Hexagonal Shanks


Gentlemen:  Stephen, Ron, Richard, Joe, et al,

This silly argument got started when Joe said that a 3/32-inch hexagonal
shank is as strong as a 1/4-inch round shank, and I challenged it.  Now, it
seems this discussion has gone off the deep end.  Stephen (Dr. Birkett), I
still say we are talking about piano hammer shanks of various dimensions
made of maple and hornbeam woods, and not structural beams.  I do
understand that you and Ron want to use some well-known principles to
compare the stiffness of one shape to the other.

But please tell me, fellows, where are you finding those hexagonal shanks
you keep talking about?  All I have ever seen are either round, oval,
square, or octagonal.  I can't find any hexagonal ones.  I don't want to be
the only one in this group who is behind the times.

I still plan to make some measurements of actual hammer shanks, just as
they come from the box, and then I'll let you know what I find.

Sincerely, Jim Ellis


_______________________________________________
caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC