James Ellis wrote: >All of you who responded to my original "A 440 Hz Standard" post have >illustrated the point I was trying to make even better than I had hoped >for. I thank you, one and all. > > >On the other hand. Does anyone think it's worth another try? Like what we >tried to do in Kansas City in 1985? I would vote YES. What about you? > >Sincerely, Jim Ellis > > > Its always worth the effort Jim. But I doubt you will get uniformity. I know of 3 different major standards in use today. Vienna Symphony uses 444. Much of Europe uses either 444 or 442 (mostly 442) Some over here use 440 but that is mostly when some American Jazz group (go figure) shows up... the classical acts normally accept 442 if its first whats usual here. America by and large tunes 440. How you are going to get agreement from all parts is beyond me... but it sure would be nice. I tune at 441 for several of my venues simply because its a happy enough middle point between 442 and 440 that I can get away with it in most every instance. Rarely do I have a problem with that. In anycase... you have my vote ... fwiw ... :) Cheers RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC