PTG-L is still around. See: http://www.ptg.org/mailman/listinfo/ptg-l -andy Ed Sutton wrote: > David- > > Does PTG-L still exist? I haven't been able to find it for many months. > > Ed Sutton RPT > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Skolnik" <davidskolnik@optonline.net> > To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org>; <ptg-l@ptg.org>; <caut@ptg.org> > Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 9:13 AM > Subject: Re: Barbara Cassaday's "Executive Outlook" May 2004 > > > >>I am posting this to all three lists. >> >>At first I thought something was wrong. Then I thought this was John's way >>of saying that, without his active intervention, the published column would >>look blank. Now I'm not sure, however, here are some thoughts: >> >>While it seems appropriate that the previous announcement (Dear Journal >>Reader) was directed to all three lists, as it ultimately affects all >>Journal readers, the subsequent discussion belongs on ptg-l. The subject >>began to be labeled as "OT", which, commendably, demonstrates the enduring >>commitment to order on this list. Unfortunately, many people who are >>affected by these events tend to automatically delete any "OT" designated >>posts. And, this is far from OT, but it IS very much about the PTG >>organization, and, as such, is only appropriate on ptg-l, a list to which >>every member of PTG is entitled access. This is not meant to exclude >>those, non-PTG-member subscribers who may receive the Journal and value it, >>but they are, most likely, a small number. As much as we may forget, >>pianotech@ptg.org is NOT an official vehicle of PTG. PTG-L was created to >>allow these sorts of issues to be aired in semi-privacy. I would expect to >>see some board response on ptg-l, but not on the other lists, and I think >>it would be inappropriate for anything written on ptg-l to be disseminated >>to these other lists. Also,to continue this discussion on multiple lists >>adds unnecessary layers of confusion. >> >>Again, it seems likely that, had John's original announcement been directed >>only to ptg-l, it would not have been effective in informing the readership >>of this situation in a timely way. >> >>David Skolnik >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>At 08:32 PM 4/24/2004 -0400, you wrote: >> >> >>>Journal Readers and Authors, >>> >>>Here is Barbara Cassaday's "Executive Outlook" as it will appear in the >>>May issue of the Journal. On thursday April 22nd I asked her and the >>>executive Board to not publish this message unchanged since I would find >>>it completely unacceptable to work under these conditions. On Friday the >>>23rd she informed me that her message will be published unchanged. >>> [link redacted at request of site owner - Jul 25, 2015] >>> >>>I am leaving soon on a trip to Canada to attend the Quebec conference with >>>a stop over in Montreal. Chris and I have not had the energy to respond to >>>all the e-mails we have been receiving and hope that all of you can >>>forgive us for not responding until we return. >>> >>>Thank you all, there is obviously a great deal of support for the Journal. >>> >>>John Hartman >>> >>> >>>Piano Technician's Journal >>>Journal Illustrator/Contributing Editor >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >> > > > _______________________________________________ > caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC