Hi Susan, Do you think seasons may have played a factor in the loosening of centers, or is it pretty much wear & tear? thanks, Mark C. -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org]On Behalf Of Susan Kline Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 2:55 PM To: College and University Technicians Subject: RE: Journal Articles At 02:07 PM 5/31/2004 -0500, Mark wrote: >Pianos had been regulated for very, very close let-off (ala; Fred S.) >however drop was uniformly about 1/4," and rep. springs were fairly hyper. >(presumeably the wide drop was compensation for the strong spring settings?) Yes, I think that is probably true. What hasn't been said is that the hammers were no doubt extremely free. I think that people are sometimes too aggressive about reducing hammer center friction, but they don't want to slow the jacks by setting the springs weaker, so the wide drop is just the only way they can think of to solve the double-striking problem. Not the best answer, to my way of thinking. This brings up another question. Right out of the chute, that piano was probably set up well ... but let some industrious pianists play it for however long they want, and then check the number of swings on the hammers. Do we send it out "right", knowing that they are going to lower the hammer friction darned fast, or do we send it out with a swing or two less than "spec"? In working on Linfield's performance S&S D, I repinned some hammers on arrival which had 14 swings (two years after new hammers, shanks, and flanges.) I repinned them to three swings, knowing that they would loosen up fairly fast to four or five. Two years later, I got to repin all the hammers, and found the ones I had repinned at three swings had been played till they had ten. Best, Susan Kline _______________________________________________ caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC