---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, at 02:27 PM, Fred Sturm wrote: > =A0The NASM team identified the piano inventory as an area that needed=20= > remediation =96 meaning they accredited, but required a report as to = how=20 > the department was addressing this issue. I think what I was trying to say was why can't they publish the=20 criteria they use to come to the conclusion that your inventory "needed=20= remediation", so that we can be using that as budget leverage between=20 evaluations? I didn't really mean to have NASM "hold a stick over=20 their heads" regarding piano inventory -- just some indication of what=20= they use to measure it. NASM's evaluation process has a lot of clout=20 and influence in budgeting levels, as we are hearing (WOW! Scott!). I=20= think schools would welcome being able to see into the criteria. =20 Instead it does seem to have the potential of being very subjective. Am I making any sense today? (got very little lsepe last night) Jeff ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1015 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/35/20/c7/53/attachment.bin ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC