Tim, I've only seen the three pin Wapin configuration and thought that was THE standard. Is there a web or pictures that show the two pin method? Thanks. Jim Busby BYU -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Tim Coates Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 5:42 PM To: College and University Technicians Subject: Re: [CAUT] WAPIN INSTALLATION: LIVE! Doesn't explain why a two pin Wapin configuration works just as well as the Wapin three pin configuration. Two pin configuration has the same mass as a traditional pinning. We prefer the Wapin three pin configuration for margin of safety. The safety is the undo criticism from techs who find any little aspect to find fault. It really doesn't matter for any other reason. And yes, stability tests have been done. Tim Coates On Nov 4, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Joe And Penny Goss wrote: > Ponder this, what if simply adding the extra pin is adding mass and the > cause for the tonal change. > Joe Goss RPT > Mother Goose Tools > imatunr at srvinet.com > www.mothergoosetools.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "RicB" <ricb at pianostemmer.no> > To: <caut at ptg.org> > Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 1:36 PM > Subject: [CAUT] WAPIN INSTALLATION: LIVE! >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC