Hi Alan, I'm actually looking for 15 degrees as a "minimum" and about 22 as a max. This angle measured, at the capo, as an upward deviation from the plane of the speaking length of the string. Glue some card-stock onto the side of a small but square peice of wood (size of a key-dip block, but only the width of a unison). The card should protrude about 1/4" above the surface of the block. Cut a generous "V" from the card to allow for the capo. Starting at the capo "V" trace a line 15 degrees upward (or whatever your parameters are) from the surface of the block onto the portion of card that will stick up between the strings in the front duplex. (is this making sense Alan?) Any case, you will have a defelction guage you can reach into the action cavity with, and press up against any unison to observe front-length deflection. i.e.: viewed from the side, the string will be parallel with your line, or perhaps a little steeper. I always find it interesting, no matter how it appears by eye, how nice a job the staggered duplex bars do of keeping deflection fairly even from note to note... as if by design. ;>) best regards, Mark Cramer, Brandon University PS Don't throw the block away just yet. My "permanent" one actually has a plastic key-top (rather than card) as a side "fence," and I use it to ensure treble strings travel a straight line across the capo. With strings de-tensioned, do a preliminary string-spacing by pushing the string sideways til both string segments contact the fence parallel. -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org]On Behalf Of Alan McCoy Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:21 PM To: College and University Technicians <caut at ptg.org> Subject: [CAUT] Duplex angle Hello, Point of clarification regarding "counterbearing angle." I want to check out an assumption of mine about this. When there has been discussion about this on either list, some angle, for example 10-15 degree, is said to be in the ballpark of what we are looking for. The question is which angle are we referring to? The angle formed by the capo at the vertex, or the angle formed by the counterbearing bar as the vertex? These would be equal only if the speaking length and the length from tuning pin to counterbearing are exactly parallel. Of these it seems that the angle formed by the capo would control in part the effectiveness of the string termination, i.e. preventing loss of string energy into the duplex. Whereas, the angle formed by the counterbearing bar would have more to do with tunability & tuning stability and also the tuning or detuning of the duplex segment. In a fully-strung instrument, how would I measure these different angles? Thanks for you thoughts. Alan -- Alan McCoy, RPT Eastern Washington University amccoy at mail.ewu.edu 509-359-4627
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC