[CAUT] comparison

[Ken Zahringer]

You¹re right! My bad! (I¹ve had my coffee now.  I¹ll be OK the rest of the
day.)

They¹re both nice pianos in their own right, and I wouldn¹t turn either one
of them down as a gift.  But still, the RX2 is in the 5¹7² neighborhood.  If
the C5 isn¹t worn out, bigger is better.

Ken Z.


On 1/17/07 9:03 AM, "Porritt, David" <dporritt at mail.smu.edu> wrote:

> Ken, the C5 is only 6¹5² I think.
>  
> dp
>  
> 
> David M. Porritt
> dporritt at smu.edu
> 
> 
> From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Ken
> Zahringer
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:39 AM
> To: College and University Technicians
> Subject: Re: [CAUT] comparison
>  
> The RX2 is a nice little piano; I¹ve worked on several of them for the Mormons
> around here.  BUT - a 7-foot Yamaha for about the same price?  And only 17
> years old?  Go for the big one!
> 
> Regards,
> Ken Z.
> 
> 
> On 1/16/07 8:31 PM, "David Ilvedson" <ilvey at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> List,
> 
> I have a customer looking at a 1990 Yamaha C5 (apparently little used..I will
> inspect) and a new RX2.  For about the same price.  Any input on your
> preference?
> 
> David Ilvedson, RPT
> Pacifica, CA 94044


-- 
Ken Zahringer, RPT
Piano Technician
MU School of Music
297 Fine Arts
882-1202
cell 489-7529

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070117/67faa8ba/attachment.html