Just to offer a slight contrarian view. I've never found any benefit from drilling holes in wippens. I have encountered many actions with holes drilled out of the wippens to correct a touchweight problem and the procedure, in my view, is ineffective and probably a waste of time when you consider what you might use that time to accomplish otherwise. I will agree with one thing, and that's that touch weight will not change appreciably. The amount of weight taken off the wippen is transferred to the key as a multiplier of the key ratio, usually about .5. So 2 grams drilled out of the wippen will only reduce the weight by 1 gram. Of course, if you take even a small amount of weight off the wippen and don't change the repetition spring tension you will get a faster rise. Would it be faster than if you just increased the spring tension? I don't think so. I've not noticed any effect on tone. Other suggestions about checking friction levels are certainly worth looking at first. But with DW in the low 50's and UW near 30, it doesn't sound like you have a friction problem. If there is indeed a minimal amount of lead and weight really is the issue, you could simply reweigh the action (add lead) to achieve a lower balance weight. It would be better if that weight could be added to the balance rail side of the existing leads. It would be good to have a real sense of the FW pattern overall but if you are not familiar with that procedure it will be difficult. Personally, I would find a touchweight in the low 50's (balance weight of 40) slightly high though it is certainly in keeping with modern standards that lean toward heavier actions. Having corrected many actions for people who complained about weight, I've found that high 40's in the middle of the piano has been a target worth considering. That would mean reducing your weight by approximately 4 grams or 8% of the current weight. That's not insignificant to a finger. Though there are occasions where brighter will get confused with lighter, I wouldn't count on it for a fix. You might end up with a still too heavy action and a customer who now doesn't like the tone. David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net www.davidlovepianos.com -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Horace Greeley Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 4:50 PM To: College and University Technicians Subject: Re: [CAUT] lighter touchweight Hi, Alan, Don, et al, At 03:33 PM 10/17/2007, you wrote: >Alan, > >A prediction from me on the swiss-cheese effect: >- repetition will be snappier and more reliable >- Tone will be slightly brighter. >- Measured touch weight will not change appreciably. > >I know, it's whacky, but there it is. > >I'll look forward to hearing about it. I've been doing exactly this for years, as part of standard procedures, with the results predicted here by Don. Careful placement and drilling of the swiss cheese will save headaches. Sharp Forstner bits help. Best. Horace >Don > >-----Original Message----- >From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of >reggaepass at aol.com >Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:38 PM >To: caut at ptg.org >Subject: Re: [CAUT] lighter touchweight > >(snip) > >I am considering trying it on an action that I am about to rebuild for >our piano studio. Thinking about doing the rebuild w/o the Swiss cheese >effect, let them play it for a while that way, then pull the wips, drill >and replace, without notifying the users (piano faculty and piano >majors). We'll see if anyone notices an improvement without being >steered towards it. > >Alan Eder
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC