The RPT requirement for setting a temperament aurally was the tipping point in my decision to advance beyond an ETD-dependent tuner, who never replaced a string (not even plain wire), and move north to Boston for a year to go to NBSS. As a player, a feel sure that my TuneLab tunings were good, and I did aural unisons, but they weren't stable. And now I can truly maintain an instrument, not just pitch raise. And I really know how to use TuneLab now! --Cy-- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Israel Stein " <custos3 at comcast.net> To: <caut at ptg.org> Cc: <caut-request at ptg.org> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 3:36 PM Subject: [CAUT] Uniform Formal Education (Jeff Tanner) > On Monday, October 22, 2007 11:01:44 AM Jeff Tanner wrote: > >>Taking the RPT exams does not make anyone a better piano technician. It >>simply evaluates his/her skills. > > Jeff, > > Well, not exactly. The prospect of facing the exams often motivates > technicians to significantly upgrade their skills. Taking the exams often > does motivate people to become better technicians and does contribute to > their understanding of what exactly some of this work is all about... > People learn an awful lot when fworking under pressure... > > Otherwise, an excellent post. > > Israel Stein > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC