>consider this: A right triangle >Short arm = jack center to jack tip. >Long arm = knuckle core to hammer molding center line > (line drawn parallel to shank from jack tip) >Hypotenuse = optimum spread? > >Or is this triangle measured to shank center. I don't have the time now to >look into this. Just a passing thought. I tried it this morning on a Samick which I'm trying to get the inherent friction down. Filing, tapering and squaring the tails brought the touchweight down but not too much the friction. BTW Jack was buried into rep stop felt. Action spread was good with 17 mm knuckle radius. Moved the stack back 3mm to improve Strike point, dropped BW but not friction. This also involved moving the frame forwards and rehanging hammers 51-88 90 degrees to the shanks since they were pitched back and understriking. Also shimmed up stack 1.5 mm. Next endeavor to reduce friction: move knuckles out 1 mm to 18 mm. Relocate wippen rail for knuckle core/jack center alignment. Regulates well with spread at 114.2 mm. The friction dropped to normal or below levels. + + I also checked the 'right triangle' aspect. It didn't work measuring jack center to tip but did to shank center. I guess it confirms my spread selection. Next time, I'll use this as a start and see where everything lines up. -- Regards, Jon Page -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20071030/60dd71ec/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC