I keep hearing contradictory things about the nearly-mythical '20's Steinway piano hammers, particularly regarding the use of lacquer. Many independent technicians are convinced that they do not contain lacquer, or at least very little. This does not seem to agree with my experience. And I have asked at least 6 different, very knowledgeable, senior technicians employed by Steinway about it, and they all have agreed that to their knowledge, every Model D Steinway ever issued from the factory (NY) has had lacquer (or its precursor) in all 88 hammers. This includes Joe Bisceglie, who probably had the earliest involvement with the company. So, can any of you provide hard evidence of a factory hammer in a D without? I'd really like to know. This relates to my earlier post about the hammers being, actually, a composite. And the suggestion that Steinway developed its hammer, and its tone, including lacquer (or its precursor) as an essential element. I'd guess that most of you don't hold particularly to the purist notion that a no-lacquer hammer is by its very nature superior to a lacquered one--that we somehow should apologize for needing to use such awful stuff, or whatever. But this myth that in the golden days of piano manufacture the hammers were so great that lacquer wasn't necessary does the industry a large disservice. Doug Wood
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC