Lawrence and list, I believe that's one of the huge pluses for TuneLab. It's not bloat ware and as such does not require a great deal of storage space or system resources to run. Before feathers are ruffled let me say that I am not against any of the other ETD's but I really like TuneLab and have a great deal of respect for the way in which it is written. BTW, I use a Dell Axim all day without battery trouble of any kind. In fact my batteries are well over 2 years old and still last a whole day of tuning. I even plug it in in the car to use the GPS on the way to the next call which does give it a trickle of a charge along the way but I suspect it's not much more than the GPS actually uses. Greg Newell Greg's Piano Forté www.gregspianoforte.com 216-226-3791 (office) 216-470-8634 (mobile) -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Becker, Lawrence (beckerlr) Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 10:01 AM To: College and University Technicians Subject: Re: [CAUT] electronic tuning device preference? Dearest list- One thing that I haven't seen mentioned in the comparison and discussion is the hardware, especially using a pda. I bought a Dell Axim for running Verituner on, and although I really like Verituner, including the VT-100 dedicated machine, I despise the Dell. I've had a number of problems, some of which were sort of addressed by the company after many calls to India. Its graphics are great, but that's where it wants to put all its computing power, and there's not enough left to process the sound signal. For the Dell, it's all about looking good. Also, I can barely get through 1 pitch raise and tuning before the standard battery is wiped out. In contrast, we have hp iPAQs running pRCT here at CCM, and the machines are as trouble-free as anything with electronics can be. If they clog up, we do a soft-reset, and off you go for another few months. I think RCT doesn't use as much juice during the tuning as VT, but the charge lasts more than half a day on the standard battery. Lawrence Becker, RPT Piano Technician College-Conservatory of Music University of Cincinnati -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Keith Kopp Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 5:11 PM To: jminor at uiuc.edu; College and University Technicians Subject: Re: [CAUT] electronic tuning device preference? John and all, To help me answer this question put to me on several occasions and in anticipation of more to come, I did a non-scientific study on four ETD devises. The results are attached. Keith Kopp Brigham Young University -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of John Minor Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 12:32 PM To: caut Subject: [CAUT] electronic tuning device preference? Just curious what ETD others prefer. I'm considering making a purchase soon. Thanks. John Minor University of Illinois
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC