Yeah, that's what I'm chewing on at the moment Jim. I'm drilling a new cap, and have pretty much decided to drive the pins "dry" on this one, followed by a drop of CA at each pin. A year or so ago I did a test to see whether CA, or epoxy (via a heated bridge-pin) penetrated the bridge cap better. After drying, I pulled the pins then sliced through the holes on a table saw. For the life of me, I can't remember the winner!? I did this at the Banff shop, so maybe Bert can help out. I've really got to look into those memory enhancing drinks! Any case, Ron Nossaman's suggestion was/is that only the surface matters, so the depth (both went several mm) issue would be a moot point. When a valid idea comes along, I think it's important to get some examples in place in a hurry, after all it takes a few years of seasonal cycling before any kind of responsible conclusions can be made. Mark _____ From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Jim Busby Sent: April 21, 2009 12:34 PM To: caut at ptg.org Subject: Re: [CAUT] install bridge pins? I don't know if this has been said or not, but the Nossaman method of drilling the pin deeper than normal and using a laminated cap is extremely effective in keeping the top of the hole firm (laminated). Using CA glue and filling the hole may negate the advantage of the deeper hole by filling it, allowing the bottom of the pin to touch bottom, which has some negative effects. Jim Busby -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20090421/c5c9688d/attachment.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC