[CAUT] Accujust and grunting fish bait

[Andrew Anderson]

The energy is already existing in the excited string, which could  
sustain so much longer without that dampening soundboard attached!

On May 11, 2009, at 3:07 PM, David Love wrote:

> OK. I'm not trying to be a pain here so please bear with me as I  
> wrestle
> with the correct terminology (I do get the mechanics).  If we hammer  
> on a
> string that is not connected to a soundboard we hardly hear it.   
> When we do
> couple it to a soundboard the energy output can actually damage our  
> hearing.
> How is that reconciled with either no new energy is created or the  
> output of
> energy is not increased when we consider sound as a form of energy.   
> Isn't
> there such a thing as a mechanical amplifier?
>
> David Love
> www.davidlovepianos.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf  
> Of Delwin
> D Fandrich
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 11:39 AM
> To: caut at ptg.org
> Subject: Re: [CAUT] Accujust and grunting fish bait
>
> No. We've just changed it from one form of energy to another form of  
> energy.
> That is what transducers do.
>
> ddf
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On
> | Behalf Of David Love
> | Sent: May 10, 2009 10:23 AM
> | To: caut at ptg.org
> | Subject: Re: [CAUT] Accujust and grunting fish bait
> |
> | Del (et al):
> |
> | One final question for clarification because there seems to
> | be something missing in the link here.
> |
> | If we agree that no new energy is created, but that the
> | energy from the string through transduction creates new sound
> | via the soundboard, and if sound is energy, haven't we
> | created new energy?
> |
> | David Love
> | www.davidlovepianos.com
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
>
>