[CAUT] Polishing Agraffes ... enjoying the discussion!

Stan Kroeker smkroeker at shaw.ca
Fri Sep 25 08:17:52 MDT 2009


Hi all,

This discussion reminds me how taking care of the plethora of small  
details results in a big difference in the final product.  We have the  
freedom to do these things, don't we?

I recall heated discussions in past about fitting pinblocks to plate  
flanges.  How close is close enough? 0.020"? ... 0.010"?  How about  
contact along the entire length of the flange (or at least once every  
inch)?  Whether you believe the block can or can not move once it's  
securely screwed to the plate web, by achieving a full-fit you have  
forever eliminated movement as a potential cause of tuning instability.

Re:  agraffe servicing

I neglected to mention that I'm not sure yet whether I prefer the use  
of hourglass-shaped reamers or abrasive cord to remove burrs from old  
agraffes or re-profile new ones (I have both).  I keep coming back to  
the abrasive cord for its simplicity and minimal risk.  You see  
immediately (by 'shoe-shining' the holes) that you are removing metal  
but it's hard to overdo it.  Another advantage of the abrasive cord is  
that, after machine polishing, the cord effectively cleans out any  
residual compound from the recess.  With this method, I don't bother  
polishing the holes/recesses.  Simply a case of diminishing returns.

Thanks again to all for your contributions on this subject!

Regards,

Stan Kroeker, RPT
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20090925/0c6ed7a5/attachment.htm>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC