The toss-off comment was tongue-in-cheek. In a message dated 8/6/2010 12:59:24 A.M. Central Daylight Time, rnossaman at cox.net writes: PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 8/5/2010 8:59:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > rnossaman at cox.net writes: > > Looks like I > need to dig into past jars and saw more agraffes apart. > > Nah, don't waste your time. You seen one, you seen 'em all. :-) Does that mean the two contact thing is bullshit? If this is real, it would help considerably if the story didn't morph a whole lot between posts. Time spent on research is education, where time spent on someone else's bullshit is inexcusable. If you can spare the time, I'd like what real stuff you might have here, please. I intend to saw more agraffes apart in any case, in the interest of my own education. What am I really likely to find? Ron N -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20100806/ee135dd3/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC