[CAUT] curious...

[David Love]

In a narrow range you're right, but it's about the only other variable in
that situation that Ron Koval described that I can think of.  Unless the
measured RH doesn't accurately represent the general tendency in those
rooms.  

David Love
www.davidlovepianos.com


-----Original Message-----
From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Ron
Nossaman
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 5:20 PM
To: caut at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [CAUT] curious...

On 1/29/2011 7:05 PM, David Love wrote:
> You have to factor in temperature as well.  EMC will be a function of 
> temperature *and* relative humidity.

Temperature makes relatively very little difference when it's relatively
stable. RH% is by far your best indicator.

Ron N