[CAUT] More hammer length needed

Ari Isaac isaac at isaacpiano.com
Thu Feb 7 14:16:32 MST 2013


Hi Bob.

No, remember, you were going to plane down your key frame by 3mm.  That's
approx. 1/8" in my language, so trimming 1/8" off the bottom of the felt on
ten or fifteen hammers isn't going to make any difference.  No worries.

I invite you to replace the bass strings with a set of Isaac Profundo bass
strings.  My strings will bring out the fullest, richest, most musical tone
your piano has to give.

ari isaac
 
hand made bass strings and piano hammers
 
416 229 2096
 
isaac at isaacpiano.com
 
http://www.isaacpiano.com
 
http://www.facebook.com/isaacpiano.com

-----Original Message-----
From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Bob
Hull
Sent: February-07-13 2:22 PM
To: caut at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [CAUT] More hammer length needed

Ari, 
I like that idea. It sounds simple and workable. I guess that won't
compromise the firm attachment of the felt to the hammer core.  
Bob 

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 7, 2013, at 12:48 PM, "Ari Isaac" <isaac at isaacpiano.com> wrote:

> Hi Bob.
> 
> The problem isn't as severe as you might think.
> 
> It's true that the early Steinway hammers were quite short.  What I've
done
> on previous sets for early Steinways, which happened quite often, is to
trim
> back the felt in the low tenor where, as you say, you'd have to drill into
> the felt.  this presents no problem. That's all that's involved.  Also,
your
> measurements aren't as short as others I've had to deal with so I don't
see
> much of a problem.  
> 
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> ari isaac
> 
> hand made bass strings and piano hammers
> 
> 416 229 2096
> 
> isaac at isaacpiano.com
> 
> http://www.isaacpiano.com
> 
> http://www.facebook.com/isaacpiano.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Bob
> Hull
> Sent: February-07-13 12:24 PM
> To: caut at ptg.org
> Subject: [CAUT] More hammer length needed
> 
> I am building a new top action with WN&G Parts.  The piano is a 1923
> Steinway M. The needed hammer lengths after calculations is from 42.5 mm
in
> the low tenor to 45 mm in the high treble.
> Bass hammer calculations call  for 50 mm hammer boring in the low bass up
to
> 52 mm at the top of the bass section. Obviously this would have me
drilling
> just about into the felt on the lower ends of the sections.   The old
> hammers are raked I guess to allow more hammer length. I don't want to
rake
> the hammers on the new action.  What do you think about planing down the
key
> frame bottom or rails to remove 2-3 mm of height ? I am installing new key
> pins anyway. Also,  The clearance above the stack to the pin block is
barely
> more than 1/4".  It has been rebuilt at least once already so it's hard to
> know what the original set-up was.  With WN&G rails and parts I can adjust
> things much more easily than with the SS fixed rails/brackets. What do you
> think about this solution of altering the key frame? Somehow I need more
> distance between the hammer action center and the string ht. in order to
> drill lower on the hammer. 
> Bob Hull
> Sent from my iPhone
> 



More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC