Michael Wathen said: > This is a good constructive argument. A source is listed which one can > then refer to verify the claim. > > In general, I find this lacking in Internet discussions. Usually there > is one or two "Gurus" who appear to have all the answers. They answer the > questions without giving the reasons or documentary support for their beliefs > We are simply expected to believe in their wisdom because they have > researched it for themselves. > In this kind of informal discussion medium.... In the case of referenced material it isn't always convenient or necessary to provide references up front. e.g. I mentioned in an earlier post that my comments were based on work of Hall and Suzuki (c1987), but I didn't have all the exact references to hand. Of course if anyone wants these I will be happy to supply the exact references. In the case of personal material (unpublished) I agree with D. Stanwood's comments...put out the results for thought and discussion by colleagues. This kind of feedback provides a basis for progress. Probably the `guru' impression is created because inevitably the level to which each of us has explored a particular topic will be very varied. I'm very impressed with the internet list as a discussion medium...it seems to me to have a great potential. Stephen Birkett (Fortepianos) Authentic Reproductions of 18th and 19th Century Pianos Waterloo, Ontario, Canada tel: 519-885-2228 fax: 519-763-4686
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC