Keith/group, I'd like to use this reply a bridge to another current thread -- hence the subject change. These thoughts are mine, and are 'interdenominational' in scope. I don't have the threads handy. They'd be too long anyway. To summarize, there are several messages regarding what is modified on a piano (keys, hammers, actions) by technicians; versus what is considered acceptable under terms of warranty by manufacturers; versus what is considered potential breaches of warranty. I feel more at liberty to speak to this as a *former* manufacturer's representive than perhaps those who's tax withholding is presently done for them. Consider that most manufacturer's technical representatives are desk jockies who are trying to diagnose and resolve a given situation over the telephone. Their only input is what they are being told (and sometimes what is not being said) by the person on the other end of the line. When a given problem is reported, they go down a (mental or otherwise) checklist of what circumstances cause a given phenomenon. Their responses are based on composite knowledge of *many* examples of a given, but otherwise *stock* product. If a product has been modified, it skews and complicates the diagnostics process, and can result in negative relations between manufacturers, dealers, technicians and owners. In this case, we'll use this handy example of stringing braid, regardless of how innocent it may appear to be. I have been the desk jockey, trying to diagnose/remedy what was called "strange noises", "ghosting", or other unofficial descriptors. Other times, I've tried to resolve situations involving tuning instability, where customary causes have been explored and eliminated. In some instances, the actual cause turned out to be where someone had removed the stringing braid from all or part of the taped sections. In all of my cases, the owner was unaware that their instrument had been modified. Sometimes mods had been made arbitrarily by a prior technician. Other times it originated at the dealership, prior to the piano ever being sold. It was later found that on at least one dealer's store, the braid was being removed on a wholesale basis -- from every piano on the floor, without regard to warranty or ramifications. The dealer *personally* preferred the results. In addition to making diagnostics more difficult, I maintain that some instruments, in spite of appearances, were not designed to support duplexing. More importantly, there are owners who are not ready for the phenomenon of duplexing, whether by design or modification, and regardess of the opinions of others. My point? We're all aware that any operation performed on a piano will effect some other area, positively or otherwise. Because of this, we have the responsibility of not only observing (as Keith has done here), but discussing certain matters with our clients, even if it means using a *lot* of words, prior to making changes to otherwise "stock" instruments. Slightly off topic, but in my pipe dreams, I've always wished for a reliable method of tracking what is done to pianos -- a device whereby a technician could annotate items of significance to any that follow, and something that would stay *with* the piano forever. Japanese pianos created for [their] domestic sales have the "tuning" card holder tacked to the side of the case. A variation of this would qualify for the tracking method I have in mind. Too bad this is not OEM equipment for all pianos. Of course, any tracking method can be abused. Thanks for your tolerance/Jim Harvey RPT _________________________ Reply Separator ______________________ Based on what you indicated, it seems to me that someone could change the voice on these particular instruments to some degree by removing all or parts of the stringing braid.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC