Silicone spray dilemma

PIANOBIZ@aol.com PIANOBIZ@aol.com
Sat, 16 Nov 1996 20:19:08 -0500


In a message dated 96-11-15 23:19:16 EST, Allan Gilreath writes:

<<   I have also noticed some products on the
 market for neutralizing silicone before applying a new finish.  This might
be
 an avenue to check into before moving forward.
  >>
Allan
You may be referring to fish-eye remover? This is sold in the finishing
catalogs, to be added to your spraying lacquer to counter that pesky fish-eye
problem.  Fish eyes are actually little gushers of silicone rising to the
surface, before the lacquer is dried, which push the lacquer aside, and form
a crater in the finish.
I don't think it works by actually 'neutralizing' the silicone however.  I've
heard that fish eye remover  is actually a liquid silicone and it works by
making more fish eyes, actually connecting the fish eyes so to speak.  I'm
not certain about this but that's the way it was explained to me.

I too have personally heard "major manufacturers" recommend the use of
silicone and naptha as a lubricant in PTG seminar classes and offer it for
sale through their parts department.  Which means Keith, the problem may be
one of perception.  The customer perceives a big problem.  If the customer is
convinced it is bad and someone she trusts has told her that it is bad, it
might as well be bad.

Spraying it 'willy-nilly' over an action from an aerosol can is a
misapplication.  Truly correcting that would seem impossible short of total
parts replacement.   You could never fully remove silicone.  A residue of it
will always be there.  The down side that I see would be the silicone's
propensity for creeping....into unwanted areas.  If that were a real threat
though, would these manufacturers continue to recommend it?

David Sanderson
Littleton, MA
Pianobiz@aol.com




This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC