Hi Ed: Yes, there is a difference between the coupling of two strings and the coupling of 3 strings. In my early studies, it does not seem to be linear either, ie a greater difference between 2 and 3 strings in comparison to between just one or two strings. Jim Coleman, Sr. PS Thanks for sending the CD right out. I am still playing it. I expected to hear more difference in the Moonlight than I did. JWC On Tue, 10 Feb 1998 A440A@aol.com wrote: > Rich writes: > << Each string > in the coupled set vibrates as if it were slightly more massive, so a shift > down in pitch. >> > > Yes, this is one factor. However, I believe there are others that have to > be considered. > In the Five Lectures Book, I believe it is Anders and Askenfeldt(Sp?) or > maybe even Hall that describes the effect of increasing the flexibility, (and > the movement that results), of the terminus. It is shown that the additional > movement of the bridge will cause the string to "see" a point of termination > that is behind the bridge pin, effectively sounding flatter than if the end > point were more rigid. > <now he moves out on the well-scorched target, where it is easy to get a > shot at him, no time to mention temperament.........> > > Could the unison, when allowed to sound, be causing more bridge movement, > thus causing the phenomenom of "longer than absolute length" come into play, > showing up as lower pitch? > Perhaps those that want to measure such things could find out if there is > a degree of flattening when two strings are compared to one? And is this > greater or lesser than when the third string is allowed to sound. > > Regards, > Ed Foote > ( this seems like the sort of project that could use the RCT's > capabilities...??) > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC