KIMBALL

Susan Kline skline@proaxis.com
Tue, 20 Jan 1998 22:59:59 -0800 (PST)


Answer at end.

At 12:07 AM 1/21/98 -0500, Les Smith wrote:
>
>
>On Tue, 20 Jan 1998, Gregory Torres wrote:
>
>> Newton:
>> I have personally never run across any Kimballs that were anywhere near
>> "remarkable"
>> Please enlighten me so I won't get flamed anymore for taking Kimball's
>> name in vain.....   :-)
>
>Gee, Greg, if you can't trust Newton, who can you trust?
>
>As I just pointed out in another post, Kimball DID built some decent,
>well-regarded pianos a LONG time ago--shortly after the turn-of-the-
>century, to be exact. At the time, their instruments were built entire-
>ly "in-house", which means that they were building their own plates,
>actions, keys, etc., just like Steinway used to do. Once in a while,
>you come across a post to the list that reads: "WOW! I just came across  
>an old piano that looked, played and sounded really good, the only thing
>is that the decal on the fallboard read KIMBALL. Could someone have re-
>placed the REAL decal?" :-)  Nope. That's the Kimball used to build them
>once-upon--time. Just like Newton said.
>
>Now, aren't you sorry you ever doubted Newton? :-)
>
>Les Smith
>lessmith@buffnet.net
>-------------------------------
Hi, Les

I'm working on one of these now: a big Kimball upright, fancy case, in very
good shape except for butt plates, which I'm replacing. 1903. Very nice.

Susan

Susan Kline
P.O. Box 1651
Philomath, OR 97370
skline@proaxis.com

"Cheer up! Things may be getting worse at a slower rate."
			-- Ashleigh Brilliant




This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC