In a message dated 98-03-09 22:08:56 EST, you write: << I wish to assure everybody that [Dr. William Braid White] was not an 'evil scientist' but a fine gentleman of high intellect and cultivation. Incidentally, his Phd. was in music. Nor was he responsible for popularizing equal temporament; it was well established many years before he arrived on the scene. One only needs to study Helmholtz and the additions by his translator, J.Alexander Ellis to realize this. The book was written in the 1880's. >> Thank you for your information, Ted. As you can see, I am not allowed to say whatever comes to me off the cuff. People might actually think I'm offering information. I remember very well your admonition to me in April of 1990 in Quebec City: "Young man, you'd better stop going around doing what you are or you're going to get in a great deal of trouble." My favorite TV show when I was a small child in the 1950's was "Danger Is My Business". It served as a great inspiration to my impressionable young mind. I have Dr. White's book, of course, have read it and treasure it as a staple that anyone who is interested in Piano Technology should refer to. Let us not forget, however that in the conclusion of his book, Dr. White "tipped his hat" to Meantone and effectively acknowledged that its use might well again become the norm some day in the future. This while repeating the very serious error which has lead to so much misunderstanding: "Bach began to tune his clavichords in ET (sic) so that his pupils might be able to play in all tonalities without frequent retunings. The celebrated WT Clavier [music] in each of the 12 major & minor tonalities, was the first fruit of this famous experiment in intonation". This statement is patently incorrect but I have learned over the years not to automatically believe every thing I read, even if it is written by a well respected individual with solid credentials. I prefer to give emphasis to the statements he made which immediately followed his erroneous one: "Nevertheless, it is very interesting to tune a piano in Mean Tone and then play some of the early classical music...and even later music...up to Mozart." "...some of the discordances produced when the 12 [keys] are tuned in Mean- Tone Temperament might be used to advantage in modern music." "Ellis, in the famous 20th Appendix to Helmholtz, points out how each tonality in Mean-Tone posseses a character of its own...whereas ET makes all chords...possess the same degree of roughness and so destroys (Now, this is a word I take very seriously, *destroys*.) the several once existing individual characteristics of the different tonalities. It is remarkable that musicians still speak of the "bright" key of C Major, the "dark" key of F# Major, the "tragic" key of C Minor, and the "sweet" key of Ab Major; and this in a day of universal ET!" (sic). I too, find it remarkable because those definitions of "color" could only be accurate if the piano were tuned in, you guessed it, good ol' Reverse-Well. It seems to me that what has been "universal" if anything has been a profound misunderstanding of what one was doing and what one was listening to and for. While this universal trend is still largely in force, enlightened people like Owen Jorgensen have made it possible for us in the present and those who will follow us to undo this Age of Disenlightenment. I hope to see you at the Temperament Recital in Providence, Ted. You are a true friend and inspiration to me. Bill Bremmer RPT Madison, Wisconsin
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC