Weighty Problem

[David C. Stanwood]

David Stanwood writes:

>>we do a lot of action reconfiguration and hardly any of it comes
>>under the heading of geometry.
 
Richard Moody responds:

>Uh huh


Dear Richard,

I speaking from what I see in the trade, conventions etc. Discussions of
"geometry" always focus on spread, straight line rule etc. as if these
things always need fixing.  

My experience is that they hardly ever need fixing whereas leverage and
static weight components almost always need fixing.

leverage and static weight components need to be included under the heading
of "geometry".

DUH

David C. Stanwood