Horace, The art of tuning, then, is to divine the right tuning for the performer/music/piano/hall. A challenging profession we have. When you say that you used a variety of HTs, are you meaning Victorian temperaments or earlier ones, too? Tom Horace Greeley wrote: > > The "ideal" piano is transparent to the performer. This is true whether it is > used for private practice at home, for the church performance of the local > MTA branch recitals, or at Carnegie Hall. For me, as a technician who has > _actively_ used a variety of HTs for many years in many settings, if the > performer notices the temperament at all, it is not transparent enough. > > That is to say, virtually any temperament can be made to work, so long as > the octaves make sense, and the unisons are solid. The temperament, > per se, should merely provide some difficult-to-define psycho-acoustic > element of freedom to/for the performer. To the extent that the performer > is/becomes aware of the temperament _as such_, the tuning is, for me, > anyway, a failure. > -- Thomas A. Cole, RPT Santa Cruz, CA
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC