I read with some interest, the comments in this month's PTJ about Richard Brown's series of articles "Some Thoughts on the Design of Bass Strings". I was disappointed that the speaking lengths weren't given to round out the picture a little. Not having the real info, and being me, I decided to see how the back door approach worked. I plugged the diameters of the cores and wraps into a scaling program and juggled the lengths until the tensions and breaking percentages came into line with the published chart. Extremely spooky scale! Not recommended. This still doesn't tell us what the rest of the scale looked like, and I seriously doubt that it was a straight log progression, so it's not really good for much. Still, I think it's a good enough reconstruction to illustrate the problems inherent in this kind of approach to bass scaling. Try these lengths, in millimeters, and see what you get. 1 1238 2 1225 3 1212 4 1200 5 1188 6 1177 7 1160 8 1149 9 1135 10 1122 11 1108 12 1096 13 1083 14 1073 15 1060 16 1049 17 1035 18 1022 19 1010 20 999 21 984 22 972 23 959 24 948 25 933 26 920 27 1065 28 1050 29 1032 30 1016 For what it's worth, Ron
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC