><<As to your concern about damaging action centers...well, there is simply no >direct line of >spray against any of the centers so it is hard to imagine how these >microscopic spheres are going to take a 90 degree turn and enter the >bushing to cause such imaginary havoc.>> >The hydrological equivalent of this statement is that as long as you do not >squirt water sideways into the center, there is no way they can get wet if you >generally spray the action. I cannot see any way that abrasive dust (not the >spheres) can avoid being driven into the centers by air pressure or momentum. >Since I do not bead blast, I cannot pull pins on an action that I did some >time ago and check for wear. >It is for those who bead blast to prove this does not happen. Logic forces the >conclusion that it is harmful. Why risk it? > >Bill Simon >Phoenix Bill, I'll kindly bring my portion of this exchange to a close with these remarks: I think you'll agree on re-reading the preceding paragraphs that you base your opinion on assumptions only, not on empirical (or scientific) evidence. At least you haven't provided that evidence as I had initially asked. Perhaps there are real risks, but you certainly haven't identified and proven them. I and many others who employ this technique have experienced none of the deterioration within piano actions that logic has forced you to conclude will happen. In this regard, I assure you I am not incompetent. Best regards, Stan Kroeker Registered Piano Technician
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC