>A couple questions here... I know several guys who routinely use a scaleing program >to redesign the scale when restringing / rebuilding. These fellows typically are >repairing cracks in the soundboard (shimming). They take care to check "downbearing" >before and after lessening tension on the strings. Often they lower the plate a bit >(something I question the reasoning for ... read Ed McMorrows book). * Doesn't anyone ever check the crown under load? That is, before lowering string tension? By my way of thinking, if there is little enough downbearing to necessitate lowering the plate, there had better be adequate crown in the board to take the load or the board will be driven flatter, or farther past flat, than it already is. Increased bearing angles = increased soundboard load, and if the board is already flat... where's the fix? > Without knowing more about the condition of >the soundboard then its present downbearing / string deflection readings, how can >one be sure that any given new string scale and or lowering the plate will be >benificial ? * Beats me, that's why I've argued against the practice. If the rim and belly structure is solid and well braced, the soundboard can do it's job. If not, it can't. If the board is well designed and in good shape, a good string scale will sound and tune better than a bad one, but the best of all possible string scales for a given set of speaking lengths and scale breaks won't sound good on a poor soundboard. It can't be fixed with a specific brand of hammers or voicing technique either. It is my opinion that the vast majority of pianos being rebuilt today with the original soundboards, should have gotten new ones. I know, it's a big expense, and some of the old boards are adequate as is, but just assuming the old board is fine and pressing on too often yields disappointing results. By the time the work is far enough along to hear the problems, the money has already been spent and it's too late. > Also you mention some info Del has at one time offered about >viewing ribbing as a center beam. Can you refer me to any specific reading on this >and other such soundboard related material ? * Del's Journal articles, and discussions on this list (in the archives) are the most straightforward and direct I've seen. >When I am restringing after a soundboard fix, I routinely use the same scale, and >try to achieve the same, or slightly less downbearing. I do this simply because I do >not feel confident in changing things without knowing more then I do about these >issues. As far as lessening downbearing (gut feeling really), seems like an old >soundboard must be weaker, ergo less stiff / resiliant. Doing this combined with >very slow and even tension raising to bring the piano up to pitch (typically one >month) seems to be my best guarantee of not wrecking the sound of a piano. * You didn't mention checking crown either. Do you? Also, I wouldn't worry too much about sneaking up on the tension. Just chip and rough tune to pitch immediately after stringing and keep it there while it settles in. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC