Hi gang, It's me again, and I've got something for you. Out tuning today, I got to dinking with the duplexes, and I observed an interesting thing or two. You can too, if you bother to try. The first thing I did was chose a noisy string and touched the front duplex while playing the note. The tone got considerably clearer. I then plucked the speaking length while holding the key down to keep the damper up, and not touching the front duplex and the noise was back. No surprises here. Then, still holding the key down, I plucked the duplex and the speaking length sounded at the fundamental. Cool! Proof positive that string energy bleeds past the v-bar to the next segment. This was a low bearing angle, long front duplex, so that wasn't any surprise either. I located the longest duplex and plucked that. The speaking length fundamental sounded, but there was a lot of added garbage coming from the front duplex segment that rendered the combination of the two less than pleasant. What do you suppose happens at the agraffes? I then went down to the tenor section and plucked the, roughly, 10 mm long segment between the understring felt and the agraffe. The speaking length sounded the fundamental. Really cool. The bearing angle here was much steeper than in the treble ( about 20 degrees), and the segment was super short and muted by cloth, and the brass of the agraffe was much softer than the v-bar, but it still worked. What the heck, I thought, let's try the bass. Yep, same thing, in spite of the even steeper bearing angle through the agraffe. Later, I tuned a new console. No intentional front duplex to dink with, but there was that nice short, high bearing angle segment between the v-bar and the pressure bar. Key down, I reached in with my junk pocket knife blade (as opposed to my surgery blade, but that's on the other knife anyway), and plucked the segment. The speaking length sounded at the fundamental. Well, in the interest of symmetry, I've got to try the bass too. Key down, I plucked the segment between the upper bearing pin and the tuning pin and the speaking length didn't sound like anything I could identify because the segment I plucked drowned it out and turned the combined sounds into garbage. Playing the note normally, I couldn't specifically pick out the sound of the "duplex" (what's that little sucker called anyway?), but I begin to wonder how much, if any, of the bass garbage we can't seem to tune out comes from this. Anyway, the on the spot conclusions were that increased bearing angle doesn't entirely stop the energy leakage past the agraffe or v-bar. With the sampling I had, I can't separate the effects of angle and duplex length, but it is quite obvious that the shorter duplexes are quieter at a low bearing angle, and it's reasonable to expect that a higher angle will result in better termination. Entertainment is where you find it when tuning. Ron
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC