Pinblock Fit

Vince Mrykalo Vince@byu.edu
Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:25:58 -0700


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment

I understood the reasoning to be that their plates had a double flange (front
and back); and that, along with the plate bushings, made it so.

At 12:24 AM 3/21/99 -0600, you wrote:
>
>Yamaha's 'tolerance', as Jim diplomatically states,
>reminds me of Samick's defence of non-mated pinblocks/flanges during my 7
>year tenure with Samick Canada.
>
>Factory engineers (apparently including the great Klaus Fenner) didn't
>believe that this type of close fit was necessary.  If they had any
>evidence or empirical data on which to base that belief, they certainly
>didn't share it with us, their humble distributor.

>Stan Kroeker
>Registered Piano Technician
> 
Vince
<mailto:vince@byu.edu>
Visit the web page for the Pacific Northwest Conference at: 
<www.pnwpianoconf.com>  
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/f9/17/67/56/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC