Baldwins cost more to tune?

[Brian Henselman]

-----Original Message-----
From: JIMRPT@AOL.COM <JIMRPT@AOL.COM>
To: pianotech@ptg.org <pianotech@ptg.org>
Date: Monday, November 01, 1999 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: Baldwins cost more to tune?


>Diane;
> Sure I charge more to tune Baldwins :-)  Cause their pins are tight and
some
>scales are nasally. But then I charge more for S&S because their pins
>flagpole and the 1098 is so full of false beats. But then I charge more for
>Kimbals because they are so hard to settle down after not having been tuned
>for 'lo these many years'. But then I charge more for Young Chang because
of
>the usually less than magnificent string rendering. But then I charge more
>for Bosendorfer because I don't tune many......................Hmmm!......
>perhaps it would be simpler if I just charged one fee for all??? :-)
>Jim Bryant (FL)

Yeh, More.  <grin>
-Brian Henselman