(continued...) ...come to think of it, I don't see what the sharp width has to do with the whole thing, anyway. The width of the natural tails (i.e. distance between sharps at the base) is what makes it hard to get your fingers between the sharps... Narrow sharps just make playing a little trickier. Jeff >Hi Tom: > >Both Baldwin and Steinway began using slimmer sharp keys on their Concert >grands quite a number of years ago. I just tuned a Baldwin Concert grand >yesterday which was made in the late 70s which had the narrower sharp keys. >My Baldwin SF10 has sharps that are .447" at the base and .392" near the >top. My newer Baldwin Acrosonic has sharps which are .455" at the base and >.392 near the top. I have measured old ebony sharps taken off of upright >pianos which measured .500 at the base and .418 near the top. > >My fingers are also fat on the ends. I have to turn my middle finger >sideways to get it between F# and G# (which seem to be the tightest on >my Steinway L, circa 1952). > >Jim Coleman, Sr. > >On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Tom Robinson wrote: > >> Has anyone ever heard of slimming down the sharp keys to better >> accomodate pianists with "fat" fingers? An amateur pianist I know >> (...OK...it's me) has trouble with sounding too many notes when certain >> passages require placing the fingers between the sharps. I've had no >> success altering technique. >> >> Tom Robinson >> amateur pianist/tuner and faithful pianotech reader for 2 years >> >> Jeff Tanner, Piano Technician School of Music University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208 (803)-777-4392 (phone) (803)-777-6508 (fax)
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC