Could not send message to USER: jennfee Reason for Mail Failure below: ******************************************************** Message not Delivered. Recipient's Mailbox Over Quota. ******************************************************** G'day Roger and Elian et al We also had the LU-101 prior to the C108 here in Australia. The LU-101 was a Japanese made product, as was the C108. The C108 has now bee replaced by the LU90 and the LX110 (this is an LU90 in a taller cabinet with legs...a small version cabinetwise of the U1) They still sound horrible and I am encouraged by your comments regarding steam voicing, Roger, I look forward to trying it all soon....and yes the M1 (and the M108) are superior instruments! As I remember it, the LU101 was introduced as a model below the M1 to counter the prices of the Young Changs and Samicks that were only just starting to make an impact here. Cheers Mark Bolsius Bolsius Piano Services Canberra Australia ---------- >From: owner-pianotech-digest@ptg.org (pianotech-digest) >To: pianotech-digest@ptg.org >Subject: pianotech-digest V1997 #2030 >Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 3:50 PM > > Here in Canada, we had the LU101 series, American assembled >> from Japanese components. >> Current model is a C108 , harsh, single felted, unvoiced hammers. After >> steam voicing they sound very similar to the old (superior) M1's. After >> voicing it becomes a nice entry level piano.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC