The 3" model was just an EXAMPLE. I was really pointing out the end-range sizes of 48" (42" for someone who wants to see over the top) and 60 or 64-66/68" maybe. At 07:55 AM 11/23/00 -0500, you wrote: >Stephen, > >None of the piano manufacturers in the world today follow the model you are >proposing, and I'm sure there are good reasons. There's a lot more >involved in >running a solid business than spacing vertical piano heights 3" apart. > >Regards, >Clyde Hollinger, RPT > >Stephen Airy wrote: > > > I have seen several posts in reply to my message I posted subject: large > > uprights, including the message in which someone says he doesn't see any > > rational excuse for building spinets. I was thinking -- if I was building > > upright pianos, they would probably not come shorter than 48" (but then I > > might have a 42" model for people who wanted to be able to see over the top > > of the piano. I would probably consider making 48", 51", 54", 57", and 60" > > sizes. Possibly I might consider a 64" or 66" upright, and I had thought > > of maybe a 72 or 75" piano (78" being the limit to get it through a > > doorway), but it would kinda look weird to have a piano that tall. > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC