Ron, Thanks for the light bulb! I thought I was on the right track but it's nice to get the verification. Greg Ron Nossaman wrote: > >Ron, > > What are you doing with a new board to eliminate the need for a > >cantilevered > >bass bridge? Are you thinning the board or routing it in proximity to the > >location of the bass bridge to make it more flexible in that area? Is not the > >reason for the cantilevered design to get the bulk of the bridge away from the > >edge of the board? Just trying to gain understanding. > > > >Greg > > Greg, > I think the purpose of the cantilever is to get the longest possible bass > string length in the piano for the marketing department without having to > mount the bridge on the rim. So, like you say, the mounting point is out on > the soundboard where it will let the strings make some noise. I move the > bridge in and shorten the bass strings. That gets the bridge mounting point > away from the rim, and the string length is never missed. It also lengthens > the back scale so the soundboard isn't tied to the hitch pins by those > original short back lengths in the very place that it needs the most > flexibility. Further flexibility can be gotten by thinning the panel, > undercutting the low end of the bridge, or floating the soundboard in the > tail. All of these work to varying degrees depending on the length of the > piano, and all of them are easier on the soundboard than a cantilever. > > Ron N -- Greg Newell mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC