Curious about something David. We discuss back and forth a bit about ETD's and measurments. No one seems to feel that measurements are all that dependable unless you take a few samples for each note and average them out. Does the Verituner utilize some new and more dependable form for measuring inharmonicities, or do you not consider this to be a problem ? Dave Carpenter wrote: > David, > > Regarding inharmonicity readings, I would say that the main difference is > that the Verituner takes these measurements while you are tuning so that you > do not need a separate measurement step. This saves time and simplifies the > tuning process. Furthermore, it takes these measurements on all the notes > that you tune, instead of just a select few. This allows it to account for > irregularities in inharmonicity, instead of just assuming that the > inharmonicity follows a smooth progression between measured notes. > > --Dave > > --- David Ilvedson <ilvey@jps.net> wrote: > > Dave, > > > > I guess I would like to know what the Verituner does > > that is different from the SAT III or RCT? How > > does it work? Does it take inharmonicity readings > > AKA the other top devices? > > > > David I. > > -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC