resultant tones

John Meulendijks jmjmeulendijks@planet.nl
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 21:04:59 +0100


Just try any pure interval on two recorders: What a resultancy......


John Meulendijks
Tilburg
the Netherlands.

----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Brekne <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no>
To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: resultant tones


>
>
> Richard Moody wrote:
>
> >
> > As long as we are on it, what then would be the difference between say
22,000
> > and 22,440 ?   Or are there audible resultants from two supersonic
frequencies?
> > Would they have to be loud or very loud and how loud would the
resultants be?
> > Perhaps two dog whistles would shed light.  No two dog whistles can
possible be
> > the same freq.
> > The diff between the two above freqs is about 34 cents ---ric
>
> Which of course makes one ask the question.... what amplitude would be
neccessarry
> for the frequencies you mention to generate an audible resultant tone of
440, and
> how many dogs  would we kill in the process.
>
> --
> Richard Brekne
> RPT, N.P.T.F.
> Bergen, Norway
> mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no
>
>



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC