Please, let's keep the 2 CD products straight. The new 21-year CD has very good graphics, better than those on the old Reprint CD. The graphics on the old Reprint CD _were_ an improvement over the hard copies, especially when using version _4_ of Adobe's Acrobat Reader. Kent Swafford on 1/12/01 4:13 PM, David Ilvedson, RPT at ilvey@jps.net wrote: > Wow, what are you basing that on? Have you seen the CD's? I would hope the > images are of the same quality as the Journal. > > David I. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <bases-loaded@juno.com> > To: <pianotech@ptg.org> > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 1:13 PM > Subject: Re: Journal on CD > > >> >> >> On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:35:55 -0500 "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com> >> writes: >>>> The reprints CD is flawed in that the graphics (pictures) are very >>> low resolution. >>> >>> Please, how do the photos in the reprints CD compare to the >>> photocopied photos in the hardcopy bound Journal reprints? Are they at >> least >>> legible? The photocopied stuff is like a blob of mud. >>> >>> Terry Farrell >>> Piano Tuning & Service >>> Tampa, Florida >>> mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com >> >> Hi Terry - >> >> IMO, the CD version of the reprints is even worse than the paper copies >> in terms of resolution and navigability..... >> >> Just an opinion. >> >> Mark Potter >> bases-loaded@juno.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC