Tried that once. Tuned a Yamaha U-1 1 to 88 with no stretch using a borrowed SOT. Had a friend/pianist play it. She hated it and so did I. I retuned it with normal stretch and it sounded very nice. It can be done but it is not an exercise in beauty. -- Newton Hunt Highland Park, NJ mailto:nhunt@jagat.com "Howard S. Rosen" wrote: > > Colleagues, > > Do you think that tuning a piano (any type) will sound a bit "sweeter" > (narrower thirds) than it otherwise would, if one starts out with the > narrowest temperament octave (2/1) rather than the often recommended 4/2+ > octave? P_L_E_A_S_E let's not get into HT's right now and stick to ET for > the purpose of this query. I anticipate your saying to me "Try it and see > for yourself". I have and I *believe* there is a difference but this could > easily be wishful thinking. Tuning this way means that the treble stretch > (over which I am most concerned) will not be as gradual but it can be done. > > I would welcome your thoughts on this based on a commitment to ET. I am well > aware that some HT keys sound *much* sweeter than ET but my question above > is specific to ET. Thanks! > > Howard S. Rosen, RPT > 7262 Angel Falls Ct. > Boynton Beach, Fl 33437 > > hsrosen@gate.net
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC