RCT vs. SAT?

[Greg Newell]

Now I really don't understand this. First and foremost, Ron, you must not like
your back. If it has been determined that there is no real difference between
the results of the three tuners( SAT, RCT, and TuneLab) then why anyone who
intends to print invoices on the road buy a verituner, or an Accutuner? Further,
with TuneLab at half the price, why would anyone want an RCT? Just for the
pretty colors? For those who have a preference for one of these tuning aids over
another, at what point does the supposed added accuracy (now proven false?)
justify the added expense? Is it not important to listen too? Seems like much
ado about nothing. I really don't want ANY ETD to do ALL the work for me! Am I
missing something?

Greg

Ron Koval wrote:

> Both calculate good tunings, the RCT is 'nicer' on the eyes and looks cool
> to clients. (get a good piano wallpaper)
>
> I think the biggest difference between 'gear' is how you think you could use
> these tools.  You've bought the laptop already, will you have your database
> on there?  Will you be printing bills, literature, etc, in the field?  If
> you are going to use the computer as a business tool, it makes sense to have
> it with you - go with RCT, and combine your tools in one package.  I've
> switched to Veritune, but I'm still carrying the laptop for the business
> stuff.  Hmmmmmm.... maybe it's time to shop for a smaller laptop!  Anyone
> have an early Libretto they want to sell?
>
> To save weight, I leave the printer in the car, pre-print what I can and
> then fill in the info at the piano.  (double work, typing on the laptop and
> writing on the invoice)
>
> Ron Koval
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

--
Greg Newell
mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net