RCT vs SAT?

[Greg Newell]

Ron,
    I understand your reasoning behind moving to an ETD aided tuning. My use of
ETD's making similar sounding tunings came from Jim and Ric's experiments posted
some few days ago. I have no experience with RCT but I have used the SAT II. I
definitely like TuneLab better. I must qualify that by saying that I'm not
nearly as experienced in the operation of probably ANY of these ETD's as Jim
Coleman is. Given his history and experience and understanding of the operation
of each unit I do not find it hard to believe that a similar tuning could be
obtained with any of the 3 ETD's mentioned. What then remains for me is what I
wish to do in the filed. I like to print invoices on the spot and I like the
cost savings with TuneLab. I return to the idea that a "superior" tuning can be
had with any of the 3 if one knows how to use the program. I have no knowledge
of the Verituner except the assertions of the few of the folks from this list
who have justified their expenditure by saying that it's better than anything
else out there. I still think this remains to be seen, or rather heard.

best,
Greg

Ron Koval wrote:

> Welll.......
>
> I suppose it's just a reflection of my tuning journey.  I saw in the field
> wide variences of 'acceptable' tunings. (the tuner got paid)  Also, over the
> years, I noticed that tunings changed for tuners as their ears aged.  Those
> two observations (for me) led me to think of aural tuning as fine wine
> making; there are vintage-worthy tunings, and there are some "off" tunings,
> depending, I suppose on the phase of the moon, what you ate for dinner last
> night, etc.. Also, I wanted to avoid in my "golden years" those tunings that
> the last octave is tuned WAY HIGH!
>
> I made the choice (again, just me) to begin the search for a machine that
> would be able to calculate the best tunings.  That led me to RCT, (Yes, I
> tried tunelab first, I don't accept your premise that all the machines make
> the same tunings - try it some time!) and once I was carrying the laptop, I
> began using it for all the other business applications.  Even got a little
> printer that I carried into the house for a year.  Now, to save weight, I
> preprint stuff, but I miss the ability to do everything in the home.
>
> Now my journey has brought me to using the Verituner, and yes, the tunings
> are "better". (better octaves through the break, cleaner double and triples)
> But, I'm still hooked on the business benefits that a laptop can bring. (no
> paperwork at home) So, for now, I drag both around, the service bag holds
> the VT and tuning tools, the laptop bag holds the 'puter, steamer iron,
> bills, and xtension cord. A third bag is in the car with the printer, if
> needed. It's about the same weight as before, but easier to carry with two
> bags.
>
> Am I looking to change my gear?  Well sure!  I like toys. If I could do
> everything with my Palm, I probably would, it would save a bunch of weight.
>
> Notice I didn't say that EDT tuning is for everyone, just the best choice
> for me, looking toward the future.
>
> Ron Koval
> Earplugs in, headlamp on, VT cranked up, GO!
> (don't you just love dark living rooms?)
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

--
Greg Newell
mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net