>Junk hammers? I'll buy that. But why the HUGE change in tone across the >break? I would think that if all the hammers are whatever grade of junk, >then this must go way beyond hammers only. > >Del or Ron? Any input from a belly/scaling perspective? > >Terry Farrell Doesn't seem much likely to me that someone cranking hammers out as fast as they possibly could would manage to find the time, motivation, and means to arrange for the bass section to be of an entirely different character than the tenor and treble section of that particular set of hammers. Anyone with that kind of ambition and talent could do a lot more damage in politics. Query - imperative, first tier - priority conceptual validation... does not compute. Alternative, pejorative reevaluation - affirmative non validation initial premise. Secondary alternate probability, negative popularity scenario - soundboard disfunction. High positive probability. PC negative - inescapable. Che sara. End-trans. For what it's worth. I have a BB in a small college that is the FAVORITE piano of EVERYONE in the entire ZIP code. The soundboard is concave in the killer octave (BWAAAAArrrr on attack, pitiful sustain), I replace a broken string on average twice a year because of the obscene counter bearing angle in the treble, and the string rendering through the tenor and treble is so abysmal that the piano is virtually un-tunable. What's the selling point? It's the only piano they have that doesn't CLANG like a Hari Krishna recruitment drive. Look elsewhere than the hammers, I would. Use the Force. Yoda Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC