Hi Scott, I totally agree. I got so frustrated with trying to read the digest form that I recently unsuscribed from digest and re-subscribed on the "live" list. Now instead of scrolling through masses of html and multi-levels of a thread, I can simply order the topics in alphabetical order and delete those I'm not interested in quickly. Mind you I now get 90 per day from this list and not the 6 or 7 digest versions, not much quicker to download but overall much easier to deal with. Regards, Graeme Harvey New Plymouth New Zealand > As a reader of the digest version, the biggest thing bogging me > down is HTML formatted mail. > Why can't people be content to send plain text to the list? > Fancy fonts, colours, headings and paragraphs do not add to the > information conveyed, but make reading the digest a > night-mare! > > This also applies to the archives. Messages from a few years ago > are neat, tidy and readable. Try searching through > recent messages - Aaaaaahhhhh! > Formatted messages also take twice as long to download, and take > up twice as much space on the archive hard-drive. > I vote we all use plain text - anyone else? > > > Scott Jackson > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC