Ron Overs wrote: > Richard wrote; > > > >There still remains to be written the definitive treatise on the > >Front Duplex. > >>Most of what has been published on the subject is either speculative or > >>declarative in nature, without support hard data to back up any assertions > > >made. > > Ron N replied; > > >And how do you know you haven't already read it and just didn't recognize > >it as the good stuff? That's the basic problem with comparing other > >peoples' opinions to arrive at truth without actually getting some on you. > >Knowledge is a kit, after all, and we have to make and remake a lot of our > >own pieces to fill gaps and connect parts. Without knowing how conflicting > >information was arrived at, and what assumptions are blended into the > >aggregate, it's hard to reach conclusions by sifting rumors. Consider too, > >that the definitive ANYTHING of today too easily becomes the entrenched > >dogma of tomorrow - like the tuned front duplex did in the first place. > > Very nicely put. > > The problem of our age is sifting the real information from a sea of confusion. > > Ron O > -- Hey... I agree, and I believe thats what I stated in the first place....tho I would probably go a bit further in defining the sources of that confusion. I liked Dels answer to Duplex Dan recently..... He said right out that his experience and Dans were bound to differ due to differening starting perspectives.... and.. (more importantly) he left the door to the "truth of the matter" ajar as well it should be. -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC